What occurs if a user fails to provide feedback on a proof?

When a user fails to provide feedback on a proof, it typically leads to the proof advancing to the next stage automatically. This design allows the workflow to continue without unnecessary delays, ensuring that the process remains efficient and progresses as intended.

In many systems, there are built-in mechanisms to handle cases where feedback is not received within a certain timeframe. By allowing the proof to move forward, it avoids stagnation and keeps projects on track. This approach helps to streamline operations, particularly in environments where timely decisions are crucial.

The option suggesting that the user receives a reminder to provide feedback may commonly be found in some systems, but it is not universal. The concept of automatically discarding a proof would hinder productivity and is typically not implemented in most workflows. Lastly, requiring feedback before moving forward could lead to bottlenecks, making the process less agile and responsive. Therefore, allowing automatic progression in the absence of feedback ensures continuity and adaptability in the workflow.