What can indicate interference from AI during a verification process?

The indication of interference from AI during a verification process can be attributed to a lack of authentic movements and an overly glitchy video feed. When AI is involved, it may struggle to replicate the nuanced and varied movements of a real human. Instead, the result can be robotic or unnatural, which becomes conspicuous in the verification context. An overly glitchy video feed is often a hallmark of AI manipulation or error, suggesting that the technological process might not be effectively capturing genuine human behavior.

In contrast, an increase in human-like movements might suggest that the AI is successfully mimicking human behavior, which does not indicate interference. An overly smooth and clear video feed could imply good quality or successful processing of information, rather than a signal of its nature being artificial. Similarly, consistent facial features displayed may indicate a lack of variety associated with genuine human expressions but does not necessarily denote interference. Thus, option B is consistent with the markers of AI interference during a verification process.